For 3PLs, distributors and ecosystem players

Run multi-client warehousing and freight on one platform — and bill every client to the unit.

For 3PLs, distributors and ecosystem players: each client's stock isolated, surface freight on the same record as the order, multi-drop load plans that cut trips, and per-client storage/pick/freight billing that's precise.

Rated 4.4 on G2 · 4.8 on Capterra. Built multi-client by design, proven at some of India's largest manufacturers and LSPs.

One warehouse, many walled clients, one shared freight layer, billed per client A glass "Shared warehouse" frame titled "One platform · many clients" holds three walled client lanes — Client A, B and C — each carrying an "isolated" chip, separated by hairline walls so no stock bleeds across. Beneath all three runs one shared surface-freight band labelled "Surface freight — one layer, all clients". A multi-drop load card rides the same record: Load #ML-2208, 3 clients · 4 drops · 1 truck, closing on POD. Below a hairline divider, a per-client billing strip lists storage + pick + freight per client, each tagged "per-client billing · live". The base render shows the full picture with no JS; a single scroll-gated entrance settles the three walled lanes in once, then holds.

Sound familiar?

Three moments where running three systems eats a thin 3PL margin

Three moments where running a separate warehouse system, freight system and billing spreadsheet costs a 3PL margin, and what each costs
The moment What goes wrong today What it costs
You onboard a new client A separate WMS, a separate TMS and a billing spreadsheet to wire up Slow onboarding; client SLAs at risk before you start
A truck could carry three clients’ drops No multi-drop load planning across warehouse + freight More trips than needed — per-shipment margin is the whole game
Month-end billing Storage, pick and freight charges rebuilt by hand per client Billing leakage and disputes; an ops headcount on reconciliation

For a 3PL, the margin is per-shipment and per-client — and it leaks where the systems don’t meet.

What it does

Multi-client warehousing and freight, capability by capability

The capabilities below are live today; the powered-by layer is built to sit under or beside your stack. We show you which is which.

Live · surface freight on the order

Surface freight on the same record as the order

The use case

We pay enterprise money for a platform that still can’t do freight — we want OMS, WMS and freight under one roof, priced for a 3PL.

What we do

  • Weight / volume-based surface-freight rules
  • Appointment-based dispatch
  • Multi-drop load planning on the same record

What it’s worth

No separate TMS licence; freight auto-reconciles against the order.

Freight, warehouse and order on one multi-drop dispatch record, closing on proof of delivery A glass dispatch-record panel on a pale-cyan mesh, headed by a de-identified multi-drop dispatch line, three drops on one record, with a green Live pill. Three lanes sit on the one record. Order, a de-identified multi-drop order of three drops with a subtotal of rupees 38,400. Warehouse, a goods-received note, GRN, feeding pick and dispatch. And Surface freight, the hero lane, filled in with a charge of rupees 2,640 tagged by weight and volume for 96 kilograms. A short hairline ties the freight lane to an order-total tile of rupees 41,040 with a small node, showing they sit on the same record, not a second system. Below, a flow rail runs from GRN through a multi-drop dispatch of three numbered drop stops to a green proof-of-delivery tile that closes the record. Two faint de-identified ghost rows behind imply a multi-client dispatch book. A caption reads: surface freight fills in on the same record as the order, by weight and volume, closing on proof of delivery. Figures are a representative example, not a specific customer’s data.

One record — multi-drop dispatch · 3 drops:

  • Order ₹38,400 — a multi-drop order of 3 drops, subtotal
  • Warehouse GRN — goods-received feeds pick and dispatch
  • Surface freight ₹2,640 — by weight / volume, filled in on the same record

Order total ₹41,040 — order and freight on one record, closing on POD, no separate TMS licence

Proof

  • A distributor wanting WMS + TMS from GRN to multi-drop dispatch.
  • A building-materials marketplace running appointment-based site delivery and weight-based freight out of the box.
Live

Each client’s stock isolated, on one multi-tenant platform

We manage inventory for several clients and need each one’s stock ring-fenced, with a single freight integration across all.

What we do
Multi-client WMS keeps every client’s stock isolated and synced on its own, with one freight layer serving them all.
Consequence
Onboard a new client without a new system; no cross-client stock bleed.

National omni-grocery operators fulfilling online orders from store networks on a same-day promise — two systems was the bottleneck.

Each client ring-fenced on one platform, with one freight layer across all A glass card on a pale-cyan mesh. Three client panes sit side by side — Client A with 1,240 units, Client B with 860, Client C with 2,015 — each walled off from the next by a divider with a small lock marker, so no stock crosses between clients. All three panes rest on one continuous platform base-rail labelled “One platform”. Beneath it, a single continuous freight-layer rail labelled “Freight layer, one across all” carries a green “Live” pill and touches every client pane, showing one shared freight layer serving them all. The per-client figures are an illustrative example, not a specific customer’s data.

One platform — every client ring-fenced:

  • Client A — stock isolated 1,240
  • Client B — stock isolated 860
  • Client C — stock isolated 2,015

One freight layer — a single freight integration serving every client across all

Figures are an illustrative example, not a customer’s data.

Multi-drop load plans that cut trips

Live

“We run large-volume multi-drop truck loads and want fewer trips a day.”

Optimised load plans and delivery sequences so each truck carries more and runs fewer trips.

One truck, six drops, sequenced into a tighter optimised route A glass panel on a pale-cyan mesh shows a single optimised multi-drop route for one truck. A hub depot node anchors the route at the left. Six drop stops, numbered one to six in delivery order, are connected by one clean green routed path that loops out from the hub and back. A fainter, longer route with extra crossings sits behind it to show the un-optimised plan. A small truck glyph sits on the optimised path. Two neutral chips read six drops, one truck, and fewer trips per day. No customer name, percentage or savings figure is shown.

Optimised multi-drop route

  • One hub, six drops sequenced into the delivery order
  • One truck runs the loop — each truck carries more, runs fewer trips

Direct fuel and trip cost out — the lever that moves a thin 3PL margin.

A large distributor in our pipeline cuts trips per day on optimised multi-drop load plans.

Live · per-client billing built from the operational record

Per-client billing, precise and transparent

The use case

Our real pain is billing accuracy and client SLA visibility — month-end is rebuilt by hand.”

What we do

Storage, pick and freight charges captured per client at the event, with client-facing SLA visibility.

What it’s worth

An ops headcount off month-end.

Proof

  • A 3PL with storage / pick billing ready from day one
Per-client billing built from the operational record: storage, pick and surface-freight charges captured per client at the event, rolled up to one invoice that resolves when the order closes on POD On the left, a small de-identified client rate card lists three rate rows — storage per unit-day, pick per line, and surface freight per kilogram — with the rate values shown as neutral placeholders, not a printed price. A POD-close check node ties the rate card to the invoice on the right. The invoice, headed Client A and tagged per client, isolated, has three line rows that map one to one to the rate card — storage captured at the storage event, pick captured at the pick event, surface freight captured at dispatch — and a ruled total row that resolves when the order closes on POD. Two faint ghost invoices for other clients sit behind it, implying a multi-client billing book. The quantities and rates are an illustrative example, not a specific customer's data or a printed tariff.

Client rate card — de-identified:

  • Storage / unit·day
  • Pick / line
  • Surface freight / kg

Generated off the client rate card at POD-close — charges captured per client at the event:

  • Storage — captured at the storage event 240
  • Pick — captured at the pick event 86
  • Surface freight — captured at dispatch 312

Total — resolves when the order closes on POD 638

Each client bills off its own rate card. Figures are an illustrative example, not a customer’s data or a printed tariff.

Powered by Fretron — under or beside your own stack

built to meet

We’re a logistics-tech platform — we want WMS+TMS capability to sit under or beside what we run, not replace it.

What we do
API-first stack providing inventory and shipment visibility beneath or alongside your platform — a “powered by Fretron” layer.
What it saves
Add WMS/TMS depth without rebuilding it; we own the integration upkeep.

A logistics-tech platform wanting WMS+TMS capability under/beside theirs; a 3PL wanting OMS/WMS/freight under one roof priced for a 3PL.

Scoped to the API + visibility layer · land in weeks · no turnkey-OEM over-claim.

Straight answers

The five questions a 3PL asks before switching

Enterprise platforms charge enterprise money and still can't do freight.
OMS, WMS and freight on one platform, priced for a 3PL — the freight leg is the heritage strength, built at some of India's largest LSPs, not bolted on.
Can it really keep each client's stock separate at scale?
Multi-client isolation is how the WMS is built, not a setting — each client synced on its own, one freight integration across all.
Our margin is per-shipment — will this move it?
The two levers that move a 3PL margin — multi-drop load planning and precise per-client billing — are exactly what the platform is built around.
We've been burned by slow onboarding.
We own the integration upkeep, so a new client goes live in weeks, not a multi-month stand-up.
Pricing for a 3PL, not an enterprise?
Priced 1:1 to your client count and volume; founding-partner terms for early players.

Proof

Why 3PLs and distributors are moving to one platform

Rated 4.4 on G2 and 4.8 on Capterra.

The engine has run fulfilment at scale at some of India's largest manufacturers and LSPs — and we'd rather show you than tell you: see it live on your own data. On this side of the business — multi-client warehousing and freight — that heritage is genuinely strongest.

Ecosystem players including national omni-grocery operators are evaluating Fretron for multi-client WMS and freight; distributors and 3PLs across our pipeline are moving for the same reasons.

The real proof is your own operation. In the demo we run load planning and per-client billing on your real client list and a recent multi-drop day — each client's stock kept separate, freight on the same record as the order — and we run the whole flow live on your own data.

See it on your own clients and lanes

Not ready for a demo? See the capabilities up close:

See it live

See your clients, lanes and billing on one platform.

Bring your client list and a real multi-drop day. We'll show load planning and per-client billing live.

  • Live in weeks
  • Your data, your call
  • No rip-and-replace

Priced 1:1 to your client count and volume. Founding-partner terms for early players.

Live demo artifact: a client list and a real multi-drop day, planned into one run A three-panel demo. You bring a client list and a real multi-drop day — one truck, three client drops on a lane. You see load planning live: the three drops sequenced into one multi-drop run so the truck carries more and runs fewer trips. A legend lists what is live today — surface freight on the order record, multi-client stock isolation, multi-drop load planning, and precise per-client billing registers.
Review build